That said however, i still find this rather bewildering: sure, if i have a super fast machine, i might even get my work done if my software is leveraging only 1/8 of its power. Thanks for your detailed answer! i actually do have a bunch of pretty beefy machines at my disposal and i'll check wether they'll use their full potential next time i'm at the studio. Only thing: i did get the ffmpeg-time on my old macbook wrong – it's not 6:40 but 11:15, sorry for that (so ffmpeg is not 16x but only 11x faster then premiere on this machine – i'll correct this below!).Ĭonclusion: this does not seem to have anything to do with neither cc's requirements nor a specific installation (as i have the same results on three different systems), but simply with the fact, that media encoder seems not capable of using more than one thread on a single core (which by the way also explains the heavy hardware care to explain? i also tested the same thing on a 2019, 15" macbook pro, again the same results (if you're interested i can upload these screenshots too). (and my old, underpowered 2014 macbook using ffmpeg still outperfomes this beast of a machine running media encoder by the 4-fold).Ģ. ffmpeg in return does the same in 4:15 min, so we're looking at a 12x times speed difference here. The result however is the same: media encoder uses one thread on one core and needs 52 minutes to get the job done. an imac 27" 2019, i9, 64gb ram, radeon pro vega 48 with 8 gb vram – i think that should be well within requirements. Update: i tested this with two more beefy machines today, see screenshots attached.ġ. i would call this mindset delusional, ignorant and very dangerous for anyone relying on them or their products for business. adobe's attitude seems to be: "there are no problems or bugs by definition" – completely ignorant of any real world evidence. the fact that it's misleadingly named "how can we improve…" instead of "bug tracker" points in the same direction. Ps.: i do assume that adobe is monitoring this, as it was adobe phone support who pointed me here, asking me to file a bug report. I do understand that there is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to video performance and maybe this type of re-encoding might be considered a special case (is it though? reencoding long gop formats for editing is quite common), but especially in that case adobe should be transparent about what their software can do and when we should better use something else. not only the fact that media encoder is having such drastic problems, but even more so adobe's (non-) way of handeling this. What differentiates this utility from other media encoders is the possibility to directly export jobs from its symbiotic apps listed above, without stopping what you're doing, for example in After Effects or Premiere Pro.This is really frustrating. Overall, Adobe Media Encoder looks like a basic application for outputting a certain file to different formats. The jobs' status can be monitored from within the encoding panel. The format list is rich and complex, so finding the right output for your files shouldn't be an issue.Īfter you're done setting things up, look for the green start button atop the queue panel. Check the presets tab to choose a new format for your source. Once a source is selected, it will appear in the queue panel. Use the media browsers to select the file sources. The encoding process is no rocket science. Depending on the task at hand, working with these four panels alone should be enough for getting the job done. To bring every important part of the app forward, the layout was split into four neat segments - media browser, queue panel, encoding panel, and preset browser. With Adobe Media Encoder, the user won't have to dig through countless menus in order to get the job done unless that job requires that amount of work. In essence, an encoder should be as easy to use as possible, as nobody likes to spend too much time and effort simply changing an item's format. Hating or loving an application is usually determined by the interface design. What all these apps have in common is the ability to create or manage video and audio files, so the media Encoder fits right in. Furthermore, it can serve as a companion for other related applications such as Adobe After Effects, Premiere Pro, Audition, Character Animator, and Prelude. Adobe Media Encoder is a standalone application handy for encoding audio and video in multiple formats.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |